Kilimokwanza Report, 56, Dec 2025

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the emergent aggregation models transforming agricultural value chains, focusing on the distinction between technology-driven “Smart Harvest Aggregators” and infrastructure-led “Shared Harvest/Hub Aggregators.”

The analysis establishes a critical definitional framework:

1. “Smart Harvesting” refers to the technology of automated crop collection (e.g., robotics, AI-driven scheduling), a market primarily concentrated in developed, high-labor-cost economies.¹
2. “Digital Aggregator” refers to the platform business model in emerging markets, which uses technology to connect fragmented smallholder farmers to larger markets.³

The convergence of these concepts yields the “Smart Harvest Aggregator,” which is, in practice, a “Smart Data Aggregator.” Its “smartness” is not in deploying robotics, but in building a sophisticated data-aggregation engine.⁴ This engine unifies fragmented farm, farmer, and market data to power the platform’s core profit centers: predictive logistics, data-driven advisory, and Agri-FinTech.

The report finds that the dominant economic structure is the “full-stack” Agri-FinTech model. In this model, low-margin market linkage (produce aggregation), which offers monetization of only $1-2\%$ ⁵, is strategically used as a customer acquisition tool. This entry point builds farmer trust and captures invaluable data, which is then used to de-risk and sell high-margin bundled services, particularly agricultural inputs ($3-5\%$ take rate) and financial products ($6-8\%$ net interest margin).⁵

Case studies from India (DeHaat, Ninjacart) and Africa (Twiga Foods, Apollo Agriculture, YoLa Fresh) reveal two critical prerequisites for scalability:

1. The “Phygital” Model: Success in emerging markets is impossible with a purely digital solution. A “phygital” (physical + digital) model, combining a mobile app with a physical, last-mile network of trusted human agents or franchise centers (e.g., DeHaat’s “micro-entrepreneurs,” FtMA’s “Farmer Service Centers”), is non-negotiable for building trust and solving last-mile logistics.⁶
2. The “Hybrid” Asset Strategy: The central challenge for aggregators, particularly in Africa, is the “asset-heavy” dilemma, where platforms are forced to build their own costly infrastructure.⁹ The strategic failure of this model is evidenced by Twiga Foods’ 2023-2025 pivot away from owning farms and fleets toward an “asset-light” or “hybrid” model, where it provides its technology stack to a network of acquired local distributors.¹⁰

In contrast, “Shared Hub” models, such as Kenya’s government-led County Aggregation and Industrial Parks (CAIPs) ¹² and the WFP’s Farm to Market Alliance (FtMA) ⁷, are not competitors to private platforms. They are essential ecosystem enablers. By building shared, public-access infrastructure (cold storage, warehouses, processing facilities), they solve the “asset-heavy” problem and de-risk private investment, allowing digital aggregators to scale.

The future (2026-2030) lies in the convergence of these models into a single “one-stop-shop” platform. This platform will integrate DeHaat’s “full-stack” B2F model, Apollo’s AI-driven FinTech engine, and Ninjacart’s predictive logistics. It will operate on a “hybrid” asset model, plugging into the public infrastructure provided by CAIPs and FSCs. The final evolutionary step will be this platform aggregating smallholder demand to offer “Robotics-as-a-Service” (RaaS) ¹³, deploying drones and other “Smart Harvesting” technologies as a shared, financed service, thus fully closing the loop between the two core concepts.

II. Deconstructing the Modern Agricultural Aggregator: A Definitional Framework

To analyze the query’s core terms, a precise definitional framework is required. The term “Smart Harvest Aggregator” is a composite that must be deconstructed. It represents the intersection of two distinct fields: “Smart Harvesting” (a suite of technologies) and “Digital Aggregator” (a platform business model). This framework is further contrasted with the community- and infrastructure-centric “Shared Harvest/Hub Aggregator.”

A. Defining “Smart Harvesting”: The Technology of Automated Collection

“Smart harvesting” is the application of advanced technology to the physical process of crop collection. It is defined as the use of automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotics, and data-driven systems to optimize the harvesting of crops or timber.¹ The primary objectives are to reduce dependency on manual labor, minimize post-harvest waste, and improve the quality and market value of the produce.¹

The core technologies defining this field include:

• Automation and Robotics: Autonomous machines and robotic crop harvesters that perform tasks previously handled by human labor.¹⁴
• Data and AI: Intelligent systems that use sophisticated sensors, advanced imaging, and machine learning algorithms to identify and select ripe crops or suitable timber with high precision.¹⁴
• Smart Scheduling: A key component where AI analyzes real-time data from Internet of Things (IoT) sensors—monitoring variables such as crop maturity, soil conditions, and weather forecasts—to determine the optimal time for harvesting.¹⁴

This is a significant, standalone technology market. The global smart harvest market was valued at $8.38 billion in 2021 and is projected to reach $16.85 billion by 2027, expanding at a CAGR of $12.50\%$.¹⁶ Other analyses project the market to reach $9.6 billion by 2030 or as high as $40 billion by 2033.¹⁷

This market data reveals a critical distinction. The smart harvest market is currently dominated by deployments in controlled environments, which commanded $58.2\%$ of 2024 revenue, and is geographically led by Europe, which held $33.5\%$ of the global market.² This concentration is driven by factors such as coordinated government subsidy frameworks (e.g., the Netherlands’ AgriTech Catalyst program) and the need to offset high farm labor costs.² This high-capital, robotics-intensive context of “Smart Harvesting” is fundamentally different from the low-capital, smallholder-focused environments ¹⁹ where digital aggregator models are flourishing.

B. Defining “The Digital Aggregator”: The Platform Business Model

The “Digital Aggregator,” also referred to as an “online aggregator,” is a business model that leverages information communication technology (ICT) to address systemic inefficiencies in the agricultural value chain.³ These inefficiencies are most pronounced in emerging markets, which are often characterized by fragmented, small-scale land ownership ³ and multiple layers of exploitative intermediaries.¹⁹

The digital aggregator functions as a new, technology-enabled intermediary. It uses a digital platform (such as a mobile application) to connect large numbers of fragmented producers (smallholder farmers) directly with a consolidated base of buyers (B2B) or end-consumers (B2C).³

Its core function is to disintermediate traditional, inefficient value chains.³ It replaces the opaque network of local collectors and middlemen with a single, integrated platform that performs aggregation, sorting, and distribution activities more efficiently.³ By doing so, digital aggregators create value by reducing information asymmetries and high transaction costs, enabling small farmers to gain direct market access, inclusion in global value chains, and better pricing.²⁰

C. Defining “Shared Harvest / Hub Aggregator”: The Community & Infrastructure Model

This term encompasses two related but distinct non-corporate, and often mission-driven, models: the Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) model and the regional Food Hub model.

1. The “Shared Harvest” (Community Supported Agriculture – CSA) Model

The CSA model is a direct-to-community partnership built on shared risk and reward.²⁵

• Model: Individuals or families from the community purchase a “share” of a farm’s harvest before the growing season begins, typically as a subscription.²⁵
• Value Proposition: This upfront capital provides the farmer with financial stability and covers the costs of seeds, equipment, and labor in advance.²⁵ This reduces the farmer’s financial risk and reliance on wholesale markets.²⁵ In return, the community “members” receive a weekly or bi-weekly box of fresh, seasonal produce, encouraging seasonal eating and reconnecting consumers with their food source.²⁵
• Case Example: A prominent example is Shared Harvest in China. Founded in 2012, this 54-acre (22 ha) woman-led organic farm was one of the first CSAs in the country. It promotes the CSA model by planting organic vegetables, fruits, and grains and delivering them in boxes directly to customers in Beijing.²⁸

2. The “Food Hub” Model

The Food Hub model is a centralized organization that actively manages the aggregation, distribution, and marketing of source-identified food, primarily from local and regional producers.³⁰

• Model: It functions as a B2B intermediary, streamlining the supply chain for small- and medium-sized producers who are too large for direct-to-consumer markets (like farmers’ markets) but too small to meet the volume, quality, and consistency demands of large-scale wholesale, retail, or institutional buyers (e.g., restaurants, schools, hospitals).³⁰
• Value Proposition: Food hubs are typically mission-driven. Over $90\%$ of hubs state their mission includes improving human health, increasing market access for small producers, ensuring farmers receive a fair price, and promoting sustainable practices.³¹ They are a critical support structure for beginning farmers (who make up an average of $46\%$ of a hub’s suppliers) and foster community collaboration.³¹
• Case Examples: These hubs can be for-profit or non-profit entities. Examples include the Border Queen Harvest Hub in Kansas, which aims to support producers by creating new revenue streams, providing business planning, and identifying processing facilities.³⁴ Another example is the Midwest Food Hub, a cooperative hosted by the Second Harvest Heartland food bank, which sources and distributes mixed loads of produce, protein, and dry goods for a network of regional food banks, allowing smaller members to access a variety and quantity of food they could not source alone.³⁶

D. Synthesizing “The Smart Harvest Aggregator”: The Data-Driven Convergence

The “Smart Harvest Aggregator” (SHA), as it applies to the emerging market context, is the operational and technological convergence of the Digital Aggregator platform (Section II.B) with “Smart” data-centric technologies (Section II.A).

The “smartness” of these platforms is not currently derived from deploying robotic harvesters at the smallholder level. As established, that technology is concentrated elsewhere. Instead, the “smartness” lies in the platform’s role as a “Smart Data Aggregator.”

The primary challenge in smallholder agriculture is the fragmentation of data; data from different agricultural machines, sensors, and farmer activities exist in different formats and cannot be combined for analysis.⁴ The Smart Aggregator is, at its core, a data aggregation and conversion model.⁴ It provides a specialized software interface that collects, converts, and transforms this fragmented data into a unified, interoperable format suitable for intelligent farming management applications.⁴

This unified data layer is the platform’s most strategic asset. It is the raw material that fuels all other “smart” functions:

• Precision Agriculture: Enables the rational use of resources and improves work efficiency.⁴
• Predictive Analytics: Allows the platform to provide farmers with actionable insights on planting, irrigation, and pest management.³⁸
• Advanced Business Models: This aggregated data is the fundamental prerequisite for the high-margin Agri-FinTech and input-selling models. As detailed in Section IV.B, platforms like Apollo Agriculture use this data (e.g., satellite imagery, farmer behavior) to build machine learning models that assess credit risk for unbanked farmers.³⁹ Platforms like YoLa Fresh use this data to run AI algorithms that predict market demand and pricing dynamics.⁴¹

Therefore, the “Smart Harvest Aggregator” is a platform that aggregates produce as its primary operation, but its “smartness” and long-term value are derived from its capacity to aggregate, unify, and monetize data.

III. The Digital Aggregator: Economic Models and Technology Stacks

The economic and technological architecture of digital aggregators has evolved significantly from simple marketplaces into complex, multi-layered platforms. The “pricing model” is not a single fee but a diversified strategy of service-layering, with the technology stack designed to support this evolution.

A. Economic & Pricing Structures: The Evolution to a “Full-Stack” Model

The business models for digital platforms in agriculture begin with simple transactional structures and evolve toward highly integrated, data-driven ecosystems.

1. Foundational Business Models

At their inception, AgriTech platforms typically adopt one of three foundational models ⁴²:

• E-commerce Model: The platform acts as a direct seller, typically for agricultural inputs, equipment, and other products, selling them to farmers via an online storefront.
• Marketplace Model: The platform acts as a connector, linking buyers (e.g., suppliers, businesses) and sellers (farmers) and typically earning revenue by charging a commission or transaction fee.
• SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) Model: The platform charges a recurring fee (e.g., monthly or annually) for access to its software, such as data analytics, farm management, or precision agriculture tools.⁴²

2. Specific Pricing Strategies (SaaS & Platform)

For platforms offering SaaS, pricing is adapted to the unique characteristics of the agricultural sector:

• Tiered Subscription Pricing: This remains the dominant approach, used by $72\%$ of AgriTech solutions.⁴³ It offers different feature sets at various price points (e.g., Basic, Premium, Enterprise).
• Acreage-Based Pricing: A common strategy where the cost scales directly with the amount of land being managed through the platform.⁴³
• Value-Based Pricing: A more sophisticated model where the price is tied directly to the measurable value delivered, such as a percentage of yield increase or input cost reduction.⁴³
• Seasonal & Cash-Flow-Aligned Pricing: This is a critical adaptation for an industry with seasonal cash flow. Instead of a flat monthly fee, providers structure payment schedules to concentrate the bulk of subscription costs around harvest time, when the farmer has the strongest cash flow.⁴⁵ Platforms like Farmers Business Network and Bayer’s Climate FieldView utilize variations of this model, offering flexible payments or annual discounts timed to post-harvest sales.⁴⁵

3. The “Full-Stack” Agri-FinTech Revenue Model

The most advanced and economically sustainable structure is the “full-stack” model, which integrates multiple revenue streams into a single, cohesive platform. This model moves beyond a single pricing strategy to create a “sticky” ecosystem that captures value across the entire agricultural lifecycle.

The strategic objective of this model is to use the initial, low-margin aggregation service as a powerful customer acquisition tool. By solving the farmer’s most immediate and painful problem—market access for their produce—the platform builds trust and, crucially, captures a rich, proprietary dataset on farm productivity, transactions, and farmer behavior. This data becomes the asset that de-risks and enables the platform to sell a “bundle” of higher-margin services.

An analysis of “FoodAgtech” monetization demonstrates this tiered value-capture strategy ⁵:

• Market Linkage (The “Hook”): Digitizing grains, providing aggregation, and enabling market linkage for produce. This is the lowest-margin service, with monetization typically at $1-2\%$ of the produce value.⁵
• Inputs Platform (The “Upsell”): Leveraging the established network to sell inputs (seeds, fertilizers) and provide advisory. This service carries a higher $3-5\%$ “take rate” or subscription fee.⁵
• Agri-FinTech (The “Profit Engine”): Using the platform’s proprietary data to offer innovative, digitally-enabled financial products (loans, insurance) to farmers who are often excluded from the formal credit system. This is the highest-margin service, generating a $6-8\%$ Net Interest Margin (NIM) or commission.⁵

This “full-stack” approach, which combines market linkage, inputs, and FinTech, is the key to solving the low-margin challenge of agriculture and building a scalable, profitable business.⁴⁶

4. Farmer Payment Mechanisms

When aggregating produce, platforms pay farmers through several mechanisms, moving from simple transactional relationships to long-term partnerships:

• Spot Market Deals: Farmers make direct transactions with platform agents at local markets or collection centers and receive payment on the spot.⁴⁸
• Contract Farming: The aggregator and farmer sign an agreement at the beginning of the season where the aggregator commits to purchasing the crops post-harvest.⁴⁹ This provides farmers with guaranteed offtake, price visibility, and stable income.⁵⁰
• Service Charge Model: The platform acts as a pure intermediary, and farmer revenues are returned minus costs. For example, the “Loop” platform by Digital Green returns revenue to farmers minus a transportation cost and a $10\%$ service charge on the aggregation fee.⁵¹

B. Core Technology Stacks: The “Smart” Engine of Aggregation

The “full-stack” economic model is built on a sophisticated, multi-layered technology stack. This stack functions as the platform’s central nervous system, enabling it to ingest data, generate insights, and manage physical logistics.

1. Data Ingestion (IoT & Sensors): The Platform “Senses”

The first layer consists of IoT devices and sensors deployed on the farm to collect raw, real-time data.⁵² This includes:

• Environmental Sensors: Monitoring soil moisture, temperature, humidity, and light levels.⁵³
• Crop & Livestock Monitoring: Sensors that track crop health and growth ⁵⁴, or monitor the health, location, and behavior of livestock.⁵³
• Machinery & Drones: GPS trackers, automated systems, and UAVs (drones) that collect spatial and imaging data.⁵²

This data stream enables precision farming techniques, such as smart irrigation systems that automatically adjust water application based on real-time soil moisture data, conserving water and enhancing plant health.⁵⁵ However, the high initial investment for these devices and the lack of knowledge to operate them remain significant barriers to adoption for small- and medium-sized farms, particularly in developing countries.⁵⁶

2. Data Aggregation & Analytics (The Platform “Brain”)

This is the core software layer of the “Smart Aggregator.” As defined in Section II.D, its primary function is to solve the problem of data fragmentation.⁴ This layer is a data aggregation and conversion model that collects data from the heterogeneous sources in Layer 1 (sensors, machines, satellites, farmer-reported data) and transforms it into a unified, interoperable format.⁴

Leading examples of these data aggregation platforms include Climate FieldView (Bayer) and Granular (Corteva), which integrate data from machinery, weather stations, and field sensors.³⁸ IBM’s Watson Decision Platform for Agriculture leverages AI and data aggregation to provide farmers with actionable insights.³⁸ This unified data enables comprehensive farm management, predictive analytics, and data-driven decision-making.³⁸

3. Logistics & Supply Chain (The Platform “Muscle”)

This technology layer manages the complex physical movement of perishable goods from thousands of farms to buyers, a core challenge of the aggregation model.⁵⁹

• Traceability & Tracking: Platforms use GPS for real-time monitoring of produce location.⁶⁰ They also use batch QR codes, barcodes, and RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags to label produce at the point of collection.⁶⁰ This enables full traceability, allowing the platform and buyer to access information on the farmer, date of harvest, and transport details.⁶⁰
• Management Software: These tracking tools are integrated into cloud-based AgriTech software ⁶³ or custom-built platforms.⁶⁴ These systems manage the complete contract lifecycle, from origination and processing to logistics and financial settlement ⁶³, while running algorithms to optimize routes and reduce spoilage.⁶⁶

4. The “Phygital” Interface (The Critical Last Mile)

The first three technology layers are insufficient for scaling in emerging markets due to significant farmer-level barriers. These include low trust in digital-only platforms, high customer acquisition costs ⁶⁷, and a lack of digital literacy. As noted by Apollo Agriculture, farmer trust must be built through “physical touchpoints”.⁶⁸

Therefore, a “phygital” (physical + digital) model is a non-negotiable prerequisite for scale.⁸ This model combines a digital app with a physical, on-ground, human-powered network. This physical layer provides the trusted “human interface” ⁶ and solves the critical “last-mile” logistics problem for both input delivery and output collection.⁷⁰

The two most successful “phygital” structures are:

• The Micro-Entrepreneur Network (e.g., DeHaat): The platform partners with and empowers local, franchised “micro-entrepreneurs” who run physical “DeHaat Centres.” These local-level entrepreneurs are the trusted face of the company, handling farmer onboarding, input sales, and produce collection.⁶
• The Farmer Service Center (FSC) Network (e.g., FtMA): A similar model where the platform builds or partners with a network of FSCs, which act as centralized, last-mile hubs for aggregating input buying and output sales.⁷

IV. Global Case Studies: Digital Aggregators in Practice

The “Smart Aggregator” model is not theoretical; it is being deployed at scale in emerging markets, particularly in India and Africa. The following case studies illustrate the operational and economic models in practice, highlighting a strategic divergence in business models and capital strategy.

Table 4.1: Comparative Analysis of Leading Digital Aggregator Platforms

Company/Platform	Primary Region	Core Business Model	Revenue/Pricing Model	Operational Structure
DeHaat	India	Full-Stack Business-to-Farmer (B2F)	Diversified: Inputs Margin, FinTech NIM, Output Commission 5	“Phygital” (Digital App + 9,500+ Franchise Centers) 6
Ninjacart	India	B2B Fresh Produce Logistics	Procurement Margin (Buy/Sell) 72	Tech-Enabled Asset-Heavy (Own CCs, FCs, DCs) 73
Twiga Foods	Kenya / East Africa	B2B Marketplace (Farmer-to-Retailer)	Procurement Margin (Buy/Sell) 74	Hybrid / Pivoting to Asset-Light (from Asset-Heavy) 10
Apollo Agriculture	Kenya / Zambia	Agri-FinTech Bundled Service	FinTech NIM & Inputs Margin 75	“High-Tech, Low-Touch” (AI-driven + Field Agents) 68
YoLa Fresh	Morocco / North Africa	AI-Driven B2B Marketplace	Commission / Margin 77	Tech-Enabled Asset-Light (Data-driven Matchmaking) 78
AkoFresh	Ghana / West Africa	Cold-Storage-as-a-Service	Service Fee / Hardware Lease 80	Hardware-as-a-Service (Enabler, not Aggregator) 80

---

A. Case Study: The Indian “Full-Stack” Revolution

India’s fragmented agricultural landscape has proven to be fertile ground for two distinct, large-scale aggregator models.

1. DeHaat (The “Phygital” B2F Platform)

DeHaat operates as India’s largest “full-stack” AgriTech platform, providing end-to-end services to a network of over 13 million farmers.⁴⁶ Its B2F (Business-to-Farmer) model is built on four service pillars:

1. Agri-Inputs: It provides access to high-quality inputs (seeds, fertilizers) from a network of vetted suppliers.⁶
2. AI-led Advisory: The platform delivers AI-enabled, personalized crop advisory services for over 30 crops, including weather alerts and pest warnings.⁸³
3. Agri-FinTech: It partners with banks and financial institutions to facilitate farmer access to credit (loans) and insurance.⁶
4. Market Linkage: It aggregates farm produce and sells it directly to over 250 corporate buyers, including major entities like Cargill, Zomato, and Reliance Fresh.⁷⁰

DeHaat’s operational structure is the quintessential “phygital” model.⁸ This structure combines its digital “DeHaat Kisan App” with a massive physical, last-mile network of over 9,500 “DeHaat Centres”.⁶ These centers are not owned by the company; they are run by franchised “micro-entrepreneurs”.⁶ This local entrepreneur acts as the trusted human interface, facilitating farmer onboarding, last-mile input delivery, and first-mile produce collection. This model has proven both highly scalable—leveraging AWS cloud services to manage its data ⁸⁶—and economically viable, with DeHaat announcing it had achieved enterprise-level profitability.⁴⁶

2. Ninjacart (The B2B Fresh Produce Logistics Platform)

Ninjacart operates a B2B platform focused on optimizing the fresh produce supply chain.⁸⁸ It connects farmers directly to a network of over 100,000 retailers, kirana stores, and restaurants.⁹⁰

Its operational structure is a highly sophisticated, technology-enabled logistics network designed to move produce from farm to store in under 12 hours.⁶⁶ This “just-in-time” system consists of three stages ⁷³:

1. First Mile: Farmers bring produce to one of over 60 Collection Centers (CCs), where it is graded, weighed, and batched.
2. Middle Mile: Algorithms create optimal route plans to move the produce from CCs to Fulfillment Centers (FCs) for further sorting.
3. Last Mile: Produce is moved to Distribution Centers (DCs), where it is picked, packed, and dispatched to retailers based on their orders.

Ninjacart’s entire supply chain is powered by technology. It is $100\%$ RFID-powered for end-to-end traceability of every crate.⁶¹ It leverages AI, IoT, and data science ⁹³ to run complex algorithms for demand forecasting, price setting, and route optimization, ensuring a $99.88\%$ delivery accuracy.⁶² Its revenue model is primarily a procurement (margin-based) model: it buys produce from farmers and sells it at a profitable price to retailers.⁷² While currently margin-based, it is actively building a farmer ecosystem to integrate FinTech solutions, such as capital for tractors and working capital loans.⁷² This model handles over 1,400 tonnes of produce daily ⁶² and significantly reduces agricultural waste.⁶²

B. Case Study: The East African B2B & Agri-FinTech Frontier

In East Africa, aggregators have faced a more challenging infrastructure landscape, leading to critical innovations in both capital strategy and financial technology.

1. Twiga Foods (Kenya) (The B2B Aggregator & Asset-Model Case Study)

Twiga Foods is a technology-driven B2B company in Kenya that connects suppliers and farmers with informal retailers (Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises – MSMEs).⁹⁵ It serves over 140,000 small retailers, who place orders via a cashless mobile-based application.⁹⁵

Twiga’s impact has been profound. For farmers, it provides guaranteed offtake, clear earnings visibility before harvest ⁵⁰, and immediate payment via mobile money.⁹⁷ For the value chain, its efficient logistics have slashed post-harvest losses from a market average of $30\%$ to under $5\%$ on its network.⁵⁰

However, Twiga’s primary significance is as a case study in the “Asset-Heavy” to “Asset-Light” pivot.

• The Original “Asset-Heavy” Model: To solve Kenya’s fragmented and unreliable supply chain, Twiga initially adopted a capital-intensive model. It operated its own farms, a large logistics fleet of trucks and vans, and its own physical infrastructure, including 13 collection centers, depots, and a central distribution center with cold storage.¹⁰ This model provided Twiga with direct control over quality and pricing.¹⁰
• The Scalability Challenge: This model proved difficult to scale. Former employees reported the company was “burning money” trying to manage farming, warehousing, and deliveries simultaneously.¹⁰⁰ This reflects a common challenge in Africa, where “asset-light” tech platforms are often forced to become “asset-heavy” by building the non-existent underlying infrastructure themselves.⁹
• The “Asset-Light” Pivot (2023-2025): Facing pressure, Twiga executed a major strategic overhaul. It shut down its farming unit ¹⁰, conducted significant layoffs ¹⁰⁴, and shifted to an “asset-light” or “hybrid” model.¹⁰ This new strategy involves acquiring controlling stakes in established, traditional FMCG distributors (Jumra, Sojpar, and Raisons).¹¹ Twiga now provides its technology stack (software, warehouse systems, route optimization) to these partners, leveraging their existing physical assets and market experience while outsourcing day-to-day logistics.¹¹ This is a “leaner, disciplined model” ¹⁰ focused on data-driven coordination rather than capital-intensive ownership.

2. Apollo Agriculture (Kenya) (The “High-Tech, Low-Touch” Agri-FinTech)

Apollo Agriculture is a quintessential Agri-FinTech company operating in Kenya and Zambia.³⁹ Its core product is not produce aggregation, but a bundled service package delivered to smallholder farmers, consisting of ⁷⁵:

1. Financing: Credit for farm inputs.
2. Inputs: High-quality seeds and fertilizer delivered locally.
3. Insurance: Climate insurance to de-risk the farmer’s investment.
4. Advisory: Digital and voice-based training on best farming practices.

Apollo’s success demonstrates how to build a scalable FinTech model in the absence of traditional financial data. The central problem in African agriculture is that smallholder farmers lack the formal credit histories required by traditional banks.¹⁰⁸ Apollo’s solution was to create its own data and build its credit-scoring model from scratch.

Its “smart” technology is a proprietary machine-learning credit model.⁷⁵ This model:

• “Lends-to-Learn”: Initially, Apollo offered loans to a wide range of farmers to generate repayment data to train its algorithms.¹⁰⁸
• Uses Alternative Data: The model bypasses the need for credit histories by using innovative data sources, such as satellite data and remote sensing to infer farm characteristics (like yield estimates) ⁴⁰ and mobile money usage.¹⁰⁸
• Automates Risk: This AI-driven model automates lending decisions, offers risk-based (tailored) interest rates ¹⁰⁸, and accurately underwrites farm credit risk.¹⁰⁹

The impact of this bundled service is “transformative”.¹¹⁰ Apollo farmers typically produce $2.5$ to $2.6$ times more than the average farmer (e.g., maize yields increase from the national average of 7.6 bags per acre to over 20 bags per acre).⁷⁵ As a result, $84\%$ of its customers report a better quality of life.¹¹²

C. Case Study: Emerging & Niche African Models

1. YoLa Fresh (Morocco) (The AI-Driven Marketplace)

Founded in 2023, YoLa Fresh is a Moroccan B2B tech platform that connects smallholder farmers directly with traditional retailers and food service companies.⁷⁷ Its model is “asset-light” from its inception, focusing on data-driven matchmaking.⁷⁸

The “smart” core of YoLa Fresh is its deep integration with data, Machine Learning, and AI for predictive algorithms.⁴¹ This AI engine analyzes data to forecast supply and demand, pricing dynamics, and other variances in the highly perishable produce supply chain.⁴¹ This allows the platform to optimize logistics, drastically reduce food waste, and ensure farmers receive more profit, faster.⁷⁷ YoLa Fresh represents the next generation of data-first, asset-light aggregators.

2. AkoFresh (Ghana) (The Cold-Storage-as-a-Service Enabler)

AkoFresh is not a direct aggregator but a critical enabler of aggregation by tackling the primary driver of loss: lack of cold storage.¹¹⁴

• Technology: AkoFresh provides a mobile, off-grid, solar-powered cold storage unit.⁸⁰
• Value Proposition: This technology extends the shelf life of perishable crops, such as tomatoes, from a typical 5 days to 21 days.⁸⁰ This grant of time is the entire value proposition. It liberates farmers from the pressure to sell their produce immediately at low, exploitative prices.⁸⁰
• Impact: This model reduces post-harvest losses by $50\%$ in its target communities ¹¹⁴ and cuts associated greenhouse gas emissions.¹¹⁷ It empowers farmers to wait for viable buyers and negotiate fair prices, thereby strengthening the entire aggregation ecosystem.

V. Analysis of Shared Harvest & Hub Aggregation Models

Parallel to the venture-backed digital platforms, a second category of aggregation models is being deployed. These “Shared Harvest” or “Hub” models are often public-private or non-profit partnerships focused on building the foundational community trust and physical infrastructure that the digital models depend on.

A. Operational Model Comparison: CSA vs. Regional Food Hubs

As defined in Section II.C, these two models serve different primary functions:

• Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): This is a B2C risk-sharing and community-financing model. The “customer” is a community member who pre-pays for a seasonal “share” of the harvest.²⁵ The primary goal is farmer financial stability and reconnecting consumers to their food source.²⁵
• Regional Food Hubs: This is a B2B infrastructure and logistics model. The “customer” is a wholesale, institutional, or retail buyer.³⁰ The primary goal is to aggregate produce from many small farms to meet the volume and consistency demands of these larger buyers, providing market access and fair pricing for producers.³⁰

While CSAs build deep community relationships, the Food Hub model is more operationally relevant to scaling the agricultural value chain, a concept now being adopted at a national level by governments.

B. Case Study: Kenya’s County Aggregation and Industrial Parks (CAIPs)

The CAIPs initiative is a Kenyan government-led national infrastructure program designed to be a “game-changer for Kenya’s rural economy”.¹¹⁹

• Model: The government is establishing “one-stop economic hubs” (CAIPs) in all 47 counties.¹²
• Goal: To solve the problem of high post-harvest losses, boost farmer incomes by disintermediating exploitative brokers, and drive local industrialization by adding value to agricultural produce before it leaves the county.¹¹⁹
• Operational Structure: The CAIPs are a large-scale Public-Private Partnership (PPP).¹¹⁹

• Public Role: The government provides the shared, pre-built infrastructure, including cold storage, warehousing, industrial sheds, power, and water. This reduces the cost of doing business for private industry.¹¹⁹
• Private Role: Private investors are encouraged to set up factories and agro-processing plants within these parks, leveraging the government-provided infrastructure and access to aggregated produce.¹¹⁹

In this model, the CAIPs serve as the central physical aggregation point, connecting farmers (who sell directly to the centers) with processors, value-adders, and export markets.¹²

C. Case Study: The Farm to Market Alliance (FtMA)

The FtMA is a global, public-private consortium founded in 2015, with six core members including the UN World Food Programme (WFP), AGRA, Bayer, Rabobank, Syngenta, and Yara International.⁷

• Model: FtMA operates a demand-led approach ¹²⁴ active in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania, and Zambia.⁷ It aims to transform food value chains by building long-term linkages between farmers, buyers, and service providers.¹²⁶
• Operational Structure: The model is operationally executed through a network of Farmer Service Centers (FSCs).⁷
• Function of FSCs: These FSCs are the “phygital,” last-mile access point for smallholder farmers.⁷ They are self-sustaining, centralized businesses that provide a bundled service: they aggregate demand for input buying (including finance, mechanization, and training) and coordinate output sales to commercial buyers.⁷

The FtMA model builds market confidence by facilitating forward delivery contracts, which guarantee a market for farmers and, in turn, help them secure loans and insurance.¹²⁶ In 2024, the program reached 731,493 farmers through its 2,500 active FSCs.⁷

The critical relationship between these public/NGO-led hub models and the private digital aggregators becomes clear. The greatest strategic challenge for private platforms like Twiga is the immense capital cost of building physical infrastructure (logistics, warehouses, cold storage) in Africa.⁹ The CAIPs and FtMA-style FSCs are building precisely this infrastructure as a public or semi-public good.⁷

These public hubs are not competitors to private platforms; they are essential ecosystem enablers. They de-risk private investment by solving the “asset-heavy” dilemma. A private aggregator can now adopt a more scalable, “asset-light” or “hybrid” model by leveraging the physical network of FSCs as its last-mile “phygital” touchpoint and using the CAIPs for processing and value-addition. The public sector builds the “hardware” (infrastructure), enabling the private sector to scale its “software” (the platform, FinTech, and market linkages).

VI. Future & Strategic Outlook (2026-2030)

The future of agricultural aggregation will be defined by the resolution of key strategic challenges, the overcoming of adoption barriers, and the convergence of the business models and technologies analyzed in this report.

A. The Central Strategic Dilemma: Asset-Heavy vs. Asset-Light Scalability

The most significant strategic question for any aggregator platform is its capital strategy regarding physical assets.

• Asset-Heavy Model: This model involves the company owning and operating its physical assets, such as fleets, warehouses, and cold chains.¹²⁹

• Pros: It provides direct control over delivery schedules, route management, service quality, and brand consistency.¹²⁹
• Cons: It ties up significant capital, is inflexible in fast-changing environments, and has proven exceptionally difficult to scale in regions with fragmented infrastructure, like Africa.⁹
• Asset-Light Model: This model involves outsourcing capital-intensive functions, relying on third-party carriers or partners. The company focuses on its core competencies: the technology platform, logistics management, and the customer relationship.¹²⁹

• Pros: This model is highly flexible, requires lower upfront capital investment, and is easier to scale.¹²⁹
• Cons: It involves a loss of direct control, a high dependency on partner quality, and a greater risk of IP leakage.¹³¹

The future is not a binary choice, but a “Hybrid” or “Smart-Control” Model. As demonstrated by Twiga Foods’ strategic pivot ¹⁰, the sustainable path forward is a hybrid approach. This involves centralizing high-value, high-margin functions (technology development, AI/data analytics, procurement, finance) while decentralizing or partnering on capital-intensive physical operations.¹⁰⁴ This “smart-control” ¹³¹ model, which leverages partners and public infrastructure (like CAIPs), offers the scalability of an asset-light model with the coordination of an integrated one.

B. Overcoming Critical Barriers to Adoption and Scale

For any aggregator model to succeed, it must overcome a myriad of interconnected barriers at every level of the value chain.

1. Farmer-Level Barriers

• Awareness & Trust: Farmers, particularly in remote areas, are often unaware of new technologies and skeptical of their benefits.¹³³ As noted, this trust barrier can only be overcome with a “phygital” model that provides a trusted human interface.⁸
• Cost & Literacy: The high upfront cost of technologies, sensors, and even smartphones is a major financial barrier.¹³³ This is compounded by low levels of digital literacy.¹³⁵ In Ghana, for example, a smartphone can cost $27\%$ of the monthly GDP per capita, rising to $76\%$ for the poorest $40\%$.¹³⁷
• Infrastructure: The lack of basic infrastructure, such as reliable rural internet connectivity and poor roads, makes platform deployment difficult or impossible.¹³⁴

2. Platform-Level (Agri-FinTech) Barriers

• Risk & Capital: Agriculture is perceived as a high-risk, volatile sector by traditional investors and banks, creating a massive financing gap (estimated at $80 billion in Africa) that platforms must fill.¹³⁹
• Data Infrastructure: There is a lack of standardized data management and aggregation tools, making it difficult to collect and analyze the data needed to run “smart” platforms.⁵⁶
• Regulation: Platforms must navigate uncertain, rapidly changing, and inconsistent regulatory environments, particularly for FinTech ¹⁴¹ and data governance.¹³⁶

3. The Gender Gap: A Critical Economic Barrier

The gender gap is not merely a social issue; it is a critical economic barrier to scale. Women constitute $43\%$ of the agricultural labor force in developing countries ¹⁴³ and are a majority of the informal retailers (e.g., $65\%+$ of Twiga’s vendors) that these platforms serve.⁵⁰

However, women farmers face additional barriers, including discriminatory land rights and a lack of access to training, finance, and data.²⁰ AgriTech firms often struggle to reach them.¹⁴³ This means that platforms are effectively failing to capture nearly half of their total addressable market. A successful “phygital” model must have a deliberate, gender-inclusive strategy. A solution is demonstrated by the insurance platform OKO in Mali: acknowledging that most farmers were female but most customers were male, it successfully enhanced female adoption by deploying female-only agent networks to build trust and register women farmers.¹⁴⁴

4. The Solution: The “Bundled Service” Model

The evidence is clear that single-intervention programs fail. Providing farmers with only price information is useless if they lack market access; providing only credit is too risky if their harvest is not insured.¹⁴⁵

The only effective solution is the “bundled” approach, which holistically addresses the farmer’s multifaceted constraints.¹⁴⁵ By bundling inputs, finance, insurance, and advisory into a single package, platforms like Apollo Agriculture ⁷⁵ and DeHaat ⁸ simultaneously solve the farmer’s core needs, drive technology adoption, and create a profitable, “sticky” business model.

C. The “One-Stop-Shop” Future: Convergence & Data Interoperability

The future trajectory for all digital aggregator models is the convergence into a “full-stack” or “one-stop-shop” platform.⁸ This platform represents the ultimate integration of:

1. Market Linkage (The original aggregator function)
2. Agri-FinTech (The primary profit engine) ¹⁴⁸
3. Data & Advisory (The “smart” core that enables precision ag) ¹⁵⁰

The primary obstacle to this convergence is data fragmentation. Agricultural data remains locked in fragmented “silos” across different government agencies, research bodies, and private platforms.¹⁵⁰ The inability to combine this data impedes innovation and scalability.

The key enabler of the “one-stop-shop” future is data interoperability. This will be achieved through a combination of private “plug and scale” platform architectures ¹⁵¹ and, more importantly, public-private data exchanges. Initiatives like India’s Agristack and the Agriculture Data Exchange (ADeX) are paving the way, creating protocols and platforms where different entities can securely share data.¹⁵⁰ This interoperability will allow a farmer’s FinTech platform, advisory service, and market linkage app to communicate, creating a seamless ecosystem. Emerging technologies like Blockchain will be integrated to enhance this ecosystem, creating secure, transparent, and traceable records for supply chain management and food spoilage detection.¹⁵²

D. Final Strategic Analysis: The True “Smart Harvest Aggregator” (2030 Vision)

The AgriTech market outlook is explosive. The global market for digital agricultural marketplaces alone is projected to grow from $10 billion in 2020 to $22.8 billion by 2026.¹⁵² The overall AgriTech sector, valued at $28.16 billion in 2024, is forecast to grow at a high CAGR, with the Asia-Pacific region growing fastest.¹⁵³

Within this context, the true “Smart Harvest Aggregator” of the 2030s will be the final convergence of all the successful models analyzed in this report. This ultimate platform will feature:

1. The “Full-Stack” Model of DeHaat: It will be a “one-stop-shop” B2F platform, bundling inputs, advisory, FinTech, and market linkage.⁸
2. The FinTech Engine of Apollo Agriculture: Its economic core will be a sophisticated Agri-FinTech engine that uses AI, ML, and alternative data (like satellite imagery) to underwrite credit for millions of smallholders.⁴⁰
3. The Predictive Logistics of Ninjacart/YoLa Fresh: It will run on an AI-powered logistics “brain” that provides predictive demand forecasting and hyper-efficient route optimization.⁴¹
4. The “Hybrid” Asset Strategy of Twiga Foods: It will operate on a “hybrid” or “smart-control” asset model, focusing its capital on its technology and data stack while orchestrating a “phygital” network of third-party logistics partners and local distributors.¹¹
5. Integration with Public Hubs: This platform will not build all its own infrastructure. It will “plug into” the publicly-enabled “hardware” of national infrastructure programs like Kenya’s CAIPs (for processing) ¹¹⁹ and leverage networks of FtMA-style FSCs (for last-mile access).⁷

Once this platform ecosystem—which aggregates millions of smallholders—is mature, it will unlock the final stage. It will aggregate farmer demand for high-cost capital equipment and deliver “Smart Harvesting” technologies (robotics, drones) not as a product for sale, but as “Robotics-as-a-Service” (RaaS).¹³ The platform will deploy and finance a fleet of drones ¹⁵⁵ or automated mini-harvesters, which will service its network of smallholder farmers on a pay-per-use or subscription basis. This final step closes the loop, merging the high-tech “Smart Harvesting” technology (from Section II.A) with the “Smart Aggregator” platform model (from Section II.B).

VII. Strategic Recommendations for Stakeholders

Based on the report’s analysis, the following strategic recommendations are provided for key ecosystem stakeholders.

For Private Investors (VCs, Private Equity)

1. Prioritize “Full-Stack” Agri-FinTech Models: Avoid investments in pure-play market linkage platforms. The long-term, defensible value lies in the “full-stack” model. Look for platforms that use low-margin aggregation (1-2%) as a customer acquisition strategy to build a data moat, with a clear roadmap to monetize that data through high-margin ($6-8\%$ NIM) Agri-FinTech and input sales.⁵
2. Favor “Hybrid” Asset Strategies: Be highly skeptical of capital-intensive, “asset-heavy” models, particularly in Africa’s challenging infrastructure landscape.⁹ The failure of Twiga’s initial model serves as a cautionary tale.¹⁰⁰ Favor “hybrid” ¹¹ or “asset-light” ¹³¹ platforms that demonstrate “smart control” by leveraging partners and public infrastructure, focusing their capital on technology, data, and brand.
3. Evaluate the “Data Engine”: The platform’s primary competitive advantage is not its logistics network but its proprietary data engine. Assess the platform’s ability to aggregate and unify fragmented data ⁴ and its sophistication in using that data to build proprietary AI/ML models for credit scoring ⁴⁰ and demand forecasting.⁴¹

For Development Banks & Governments (World Bank, IFC, AfDB)

1. Fund the “Heavy” Infrastructure: Your role is not to compete with private platforms, but to de-risk their models and enable the ecosystem. Focus investment on solving the “asset-heavy” problem. Fund national-scale, shared public infrastructure, such as Kenya’s CAIPs (cold storage, processing) ¹¹⁹, rural digital connectivity ¹³⁸, and the creation of “phygital” Farmer Service Center (FSC) networks.⁷
2. Build the “Data Infrastructure”: The key bottleneck to the “one-stop-shop” future is data fragmentation.¹⁵⁰ Fund the creation of public data platforms and exchanges (like India’s ADeX) ¹⁵⁰ and establish clear data governance frameworks.¹⁴² This interoperability will create a virtuous cycle of private-sector innovation.
3. Invest in Human Capital: Technology adoption is the final barrier. Fund large-scale digital literacy programs for farmers.¹³⁵ Crucially, target interventions and funding to close the gender gap ¹⁴³, such as by supporting female-led agent networks ¹⁴⁴, to unlock the other $43\%$ of the agricultural workforce.

For AgriTech Platform Leadership (CEOs, Strategists)

1. Do Not Fall Into the “Asset-Heavy” Trap: Learn from Twiga’s pivot.¹¹ Your model must be scalable. Design a “plug and scale” architecture ¹⁵¹ and aggressively pursue partnerships with 3PLs, local distributors, and public infrastructure hubs (CAIPs, FSCs). Let partners manage the “heavy” capital while you control the “smart” data and customer relationship.
2. Market Linkage is Customer Acquisition: Your business is not “produce logistics.” Your business is Agri-FinTech and Inputs. Treat the low-margin aggregation of produce as your primary customer acquisition and data-gathering tool. Your strategic roadmap must lead to a bundled, “one-stop-shop” ⁸ that locks in farmers through high-value, high-margin financial and input services.⁵
3. Build Trust Through a “Phygital” Network: A purely digital app will fail. Trust is your most valuable asset and it must be built by humans.⁶⁸ A “phygital” network is non-negotiable.⁸ Invest heavily in building, training, and empowering a physical, last-mile network of on-ground agents or franchised micro-entrepreneurs ⁶ to serve as the trusted human interface for your technology.

1. accessed October 25, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/smart-harvesting-7-tech-advances-in-agriculture#:~:text=Smart%20harvesting%20is%20the%20process,waste%2C%20and%20improving%20produce%20quality.
2. Smart Harvest Market Size, Share & 2030 Growth Trends Report – Mordor Intelligence, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/smart-harvest-market
3. (PDF) The Role of Online Aggregators in The Vegetable Value Chain – ResearchGate, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345096558_The_Role_of_Online_Aggregators_in_The_Vegetable_Value_Chain
4. The Architecture of an Agricultural Data Aggregation and Conversion Model for Smart Farming – MDPI, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/20/11216
5. Avendus Agritech, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.avendus.com/Upload/Misc/avendus-agritech-leading-next-decade-s-tech-first-value-creation.pdf
6. Agricultural Services for Farmers | DeHaat Network, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agrevolution.in/business-model/
7. Farm to Market Alliance | WFP Innovation, accessed October 25, 2025, https://innovation.wfp.org/project/farm-market-alliance
8. [Product Roadmap] How DeHaat has helped 650,000 farmers across India increase crop yield with technology | YourStory, accessed October 25, 2025, https://yourstory.com/2021/12/product-roadmap-how-dehaat-has-helped-650-000-farmers-india-technology-startup-agritech
9. Africa’s Emergent Tech Sector: Its Characteristics and Impact on Development and Labour Markets, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.giga-hamburg.de/tracked/assets/pure/50840153/WP-333.pdf
10. Twiga’s pivot to asset-light model begins with acquisition of Kenyan distributors – TechCabal, accessed October 25, 2025, https://techcabal.com/2025/05/20/twiga-kenyan-b2b-startup-shifts-strategy-asset-light/
11. Twiga Foods Shifts Strategy with Key Acquisitions in Kenya’s FMCG Sector – Theouut, accessed October 25, 2025, https://theouut.com/twiga-foods-shifts-strategy-with-key-acquisitions-in-kenyas-fmcg-sector/
12. accessed October 25, 2025, https://governance.co.ke/county-aggregation-and-industrial-parks/#:~:text=County%20Aggregation%20and%20Industrial%20Parks%20(CAIPs)&text=CAIPs%20are%20designed%20as%20one,to%20local%20and%20export%20markets.
13. Analyzing AgriFood-Tech e-Business Models – MDPI, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5516
14. Smart Harvesting: 7 Tech Advances In Agriculture – Farmonaut, accessed October 25, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/precision-farming/smart-harvesting-7-tech-advances-in-agriculture
15. Harvest Planning for Modern Farming: Forecasting Strategies and Guides for Better Yields – Folio3 AgTech, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agtech.folio3.com/blogs/harvest-planning-for-better-yields/
16. Smart Harvesting Becoming the New Face of Digital Agriculture – Everything One Must Know! – Bis Research, accessed October 25, 2025, https://bisresearch.com/insights/smart-harvesting-becoming-the-new-face-of-digital-agriculture-everything-one-must-know
17. Smart Harvest Market Size, Share | Industry Trend & Forecast 2030 – IndustryARC, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.industryarc.com/PressRelease/3457/Smart-Harvest-Market
18. Smart Harvest Market Share & Industry Statistics – 2034 – Fact.MR, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.factmr.com/report/smart-harvest-market
19. Agri-tech can improve value capture for India’s small farmers – The World Economic Forum, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/06/agri-tech-innovation-can-improve-value-capture-and-transform-ecosystem-for-india-s-small-farmers/
20. How AgriTech Is Transforming Traditional Agriculture in Emerging Markets – Brookings Institution, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Chapter-Seven_Breakthrough.pdf
21. the role oF online aggregators in the vegetaBle valUe chain – IPB Journal, accessed October 25, 2025, https://journal.ipb.ac.id/jmagr/article/download/32425/20423/112077
22. Aggregator Business Model Explained: A Complete Guide – Apptunix, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.apptunix.com/blog/aggregator-business-model-a-complete-guide/
23. Top Advantages of Using Aggregator Business Model | by Bella Aellen – Medium, accessed October 25, 2025, https://medium.com/@bellaaellen123/top-advantages-of-using-aggregator-business-model-6be401ade490
24. Digital technology and agricultural markets – FAO Knowledge Repository, accessed October 25, 2025, https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/e00873f8-0973-4194-bb06-6701aff89446
25. Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) – a Shared Harvest | N.C. Cooperative Extension, accessed October 25, 2025, https://mecklenburg.ces.ncsu.edu/2025/09/community-supported-agriculture-csa-a-shared-harvest/
26. accessed October 25, 2025, https://mecklenburg.ces.ncsu.edu/2025/09/community-supported-agriculture-csa-a-shared-harvest/#:~:text=In%20a%20CSA%20model%2C%20individuals,seeds%2C%20equipment%2C%20and%20labor.
27. CSA Models: 3 Types of Community Supported Agriculture – Local Line, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.localline.co/blog/types-of-csa-models
28. Chinese Shared Harvest | Organic Markets & Produce – Food and Land Use Coalition, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.foodandlandusecoalition.org/china-shared-harvest/
29. Sharing harvests and tables: a community led farming movement in China – Food and Land Use Coalition, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.foodandlandusecoalition.org/sharing-harvests/
30. Food Hubs: Considerations for Beginning Farmers and Ranchers – OSU Extension, accessed October 25, 2025, https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/food-hubs-considerations-for-beginning-farmers-and-ranchers.html
31. Food hubs provide “farmers market values” on a bigger scale – PCC Community Markets, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.pccmarkets.com/sound-consumer/2019-10/food-hubs-provide-farmers-market-values-on-a-bigger-scale/
32. Food Hubs in Georgia – Field Report, accessed October 25, 2025, https://fieldreport.caes.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/B-1488_2.pdf
33. 5 Benefits of Food Hubs for Farmers – Local Line, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.localline.co/blog/benefits-of-food-hubs
34. What is a food system? | Border Queen Harvest Hub | Brought to you by Shop Kansas Farms, accessed October 25, 2025, https://borderqueenharvesthub.com/what-is-a-food-system
35. The launch of the Border Queen Harvest Hub | Shop Kansas Farms, accessed October 25, 2025, https://shopkansasfarms.com/announcement/the-launch-of-the-border-queen-harvest-hub
36. Midwest Food Hub | 2harvest.org, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.2harvest.org/about-us/programs-services/midwest-food-hub
37. The Food Bank-Food Hub Connection: A ‘Win-Win’ for Local Economies – USDA, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.usda.gov/about-usda/news/blog/food-bank-food-hub-connection-win-win-local-economies
38. The Role of Data Aggregators in Revolutionizing AgTech – Qaltivate, accessed October 25, 2025, https://qaltivate.com/blog/the-role-of-data-aggregators-in-revolutionizing-agtech/
39. Apollo Agriculture – Global Center on AI Governance, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.globalcenter.ai/aorai/use-cases/apollo-agriculture
40. Apollo Agriculture | Fund for Rural Prosperity, accessed October 25, 2025, https://1.frp.org/agribusiness/apollo-agriculture
41. YoLa Fresh, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.yolafresh.com/
42. Agtech Startups: Strategies, Business Models, and Profitable Niches to Consider – Pitchdrive, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.pitchdrive.com/academy/agtech-startups-agritech-green-strategies-niches
43. How Should AgTech Software Companies Test Their Pricing Strategies? – Monetizely, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.getmonetizely.com/articles/how-should-agtech-software-companies-test-their-pricing-strategies
44. Developing Data-Driven Pricing Models in Agribusiness – Agtivation LTD, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.agtivation.com/developing-data-driven-pricing-models-in-agribusiness
45. How Can AgTech SaaS Companies Adapt Pricing Models for Seasonal Agricultural Cash Flow? – Monetizely, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.getmonetizely.com/articles/how-can-agtech-saas-companies-adapt-pricing-models-for-seasonal-agricultural-cash-flow
46. AgTech platform DeHaat turns profitable in Q1FY26 – – Your AgriStory, accessed October 25, 2025, https://youragristory.in/agtech-platform-dehaat-turns-profitable-in-q1fy26/
47. Will DeHaat’s Full-Stack Model Overcome The Challenge Of Low Margins In The Agritech Sector? – Inc42, accessed October 25, 2025, https://inc42.com/infocus/farming-3-0-india-mission-agritech/will-dehaats-full-stack-model-overcome-the-challenge-of-low-margins-in-the-agritech-sector/
48. Aggregation in Agribusiness – e-FRESCO, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.e-fresco.io/index.php/blog/post/aggregation-page/
49. Agricultural Value Chains, Contract Farming, and Rural Development, accessed October 25, 2025, https://business.cornell.edu/hub/2022/10/07/agricultural-value-chains-contract-farming-rural-development/
50. Public Information Summary – Twiga Foods Ltd – 9000083020 – DFC, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.dfc.gov/sites/default/files/2019-08/9000083020.pdf
51. Can fruit and vegetable aggregation systems better balance improved producer livelihoods with more equitable distribution? – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed October 25, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8520944/
52. What Is Smart Farming? – IBM, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/smart-farming
53. How is IoT used in Smart Agriculture Networks? – Blog – Omnitron Systems, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.omnitron-systems.com/blog/iot-in-smart-agriculture-networks
54. The Implementation of “Smart” Technologies in the Agricultural Sector: A Review – MDPI, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/15/8/466
55. Integration of smart sensors and IOT in precision agriculture: trends, challenges and future prospectives – Frontiers, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/plant-science/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1587869/full
56. Revolutionizing Agriculture: The Game-Changing Impact of Satellite Internet of Things (IoT), accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.apogeo.space/revolutionizing-agriculture-the-game-changing-impact-of-satellite-internet-of-things-iot/
57. IoT-Enabled Smart Agriculture: Architecture, Applications, and Challenges – MDPI, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/12/7/3396
58. Big Data and Agriculture: A Complete Guide – Talend, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.talend.com/resources/big-data-agriculture/
59. Top Agriculture Supply Chain & Management Software – Farmonaut, accessed October 25, 2025, https://farmonaut.com/blogs/7-game-changing-agriculture-supply-chain-solutions
60. Agri Supply Chain Management Software – SCMS & Traceability System – SourceTrace, accessed October 25, 2025, https://sourcetrace.com/supply-chain-management/
61. Ninjacart: – Company – Supply & Value Chain | PDF | Retail – Scribd, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/presentation/532678452/Ninjacart
62. Analyzing Ninjacart Business Model & Supply Chain – The Strategy Story, accessed October 25, 2025, https://thestrategystory.com/2021/06/15/ninjacart-business-model-supply-chain/
63. Agtech: An Agriculture Software Solution – ION Group, accessed October 25, 2025, https://iongroup.com/products/commodities/agtech/
64. Agritech Outsourcing Software Development Services – N-iX, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.n-ix.com/agritech-software-development/
65. Trace – Agri Supply Chain Traceability Management Platform – Scalion Commerce Pvt. Ltd., accessed October 25, 2025, https://scalion.com/trace-platform/
66. Ninjacart stands out in 11 cities with just-in-time grocery logistics – ITLN, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.itln.in/ninjacart-stands-out-in-11-cities-with-justintime-grocery-logistics
67. How agtech is poised to transform India into a farming powerhouse – McKinsey, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/agriculture/our-insights/how-agtech-is-poised-to-transform-india-into-a-farming-powerhouse
68. How AI is Transforming Smallholder Farming in Africa – Apollo Agriculture, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.apolloagriculture.com/farming-and-ai-in-africa
69. How India’s AgriTech Pioneer Is Shaping the Future of Farming at Gulfood Green 2024, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gulfoodai.com/news-insights/indias-agritech-pioneer-shaping-future-farming-gulfood-green-2024
70. Can DeHaat Plant the Seeds of India’s Agritech Revolution? – ajvc, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.ajuniorvc.com/dehaat-agritech-india-startup-case-study-business-model-unicorn
71. The DeHaat Platform, Business Model and Challenges Faced – Management Case Studies with Solutions – ICMR India, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.icmrindia.org/casestudies/catalogue/Business%20Strategy/dehaat-agritech-platform-excerpts.htm
72. Ninjacart: India’s Largest Fresh Produce Supply Chain Platform | Company Profile | Business Model | Revenue | Net worth – StartupTalky, accessed October 25, 2025, https://startuptalky.com/ninjacart-success-story/
73. How Ninjacart logistics works – by Anirudh Seksaria – Medium, accessed October 25, 2025, https://medium.com/ninjacart/how-ninjacart-logistics-works-a16d3e4191b4
74. Case: Twiga connects merchants and food production – Finnfund, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.finnfund.fi/en/impact/impact-results/impact-stories/case-twiga-connects-merchants-and-food-production/
75. About us – Apollo Agriculture, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.apolloagriculture.com/about
76. Project detail – APOLLO AGRICULTURE LIMITED – FMO, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.fmo.nl/project-detail/54993
77. EBRD Star Venture Morocco YoLa Fresh: Transforming Africa’s Agriculture & Food Supply Chain, accessed October 25, 2025, https://alliance4e.org/case-studies/ebrd-star-venture-morocco-yola-fresh-transforming-africas-agriculture-amp-food-supply-chain/
78. Project detail – Yola Fresh Inc. – FMO, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.fmo.nl/project-detail/63214
79. YoLa Fresh founders on how a more efficient food system can reduce emissions and water consumption in Africa. – AgFunderNews, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agfundernews.com/yola-fresh-co-founders-interview-on-sustainable-food_system
80. AkoFresh – Prototypes for Humanity, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.prototypesforhumanity.com/project/akofresh/
81. Akofresh | World Economic Forum, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/organizations/akofresh/
82. DeHaat, From Seeds to Market | Online marketplace for farmers, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agrevolution.in/
83. About DeHaat, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agrevolution.in/company/
84. Farm Intelligence – AI, ML & Analytics – DeHaat, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agrevolution.in/farm-intelligence-AI-ML-Analytics/
85. Dehaat – Financial Information, Revenue, Profit/Loss, Expenses – TheKredible, accessed October 25, 2025, https://thekredible.com/company/dehaat/financials
86. DeHaat Uses AI and APIs to Solve Problems of 1.5M Farmers – CIO.inc, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.cio.inc/dehaat-uses-ai-apis-to-solve-problems-15m-farmers-a-20914
87. How DeHaat is bringing technology into agriculture using AWS with a farmers first approach, accessed October 25, 2025, https://yourstory.com/2023/03/dehaat-bringing-technology-within-agriculture-via-aws
88. Ninjacart Business Model: ‘Sabzi Mandi’ Reimagined | SeedToScale, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.seedtoscale.com/blog/when-product-meets-market-how-ninjacart-reimagined-the-complex-sabzi-mandi-supply-chain
89. Algorithms that change farmers’ lives | by Ninjacart – Medium, accessed October 25, 2025, https://medium.com/ninjacart/algorithms-that-change-farmers-lives-91bb2b8d47de
90. Ninjacart’s gross revenue crosses Rs 1,600 Cr in FY23 – Entrackr, accessed October 25, 2025, https://entrackr.com/2023/10/ninjacarts-gross-revenue-crosses-rs-1600-cr-in-fy23/
91. Ninjacart – India’s Most Trusted Agritech Brand, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.ninjacart.com/
92. How Ninjacart built a tech-enabled supply chain for fresh farm produce, delivering 500 tonnes daily | YourStory, accessed October 25, 2025, https://yourstory.com/2019/03/startup-ninjacart-tech-enabled-supply-chain-farmers-yrlcfr3a40
93. How Ninjacart Is Fixing India’s Farm-To-Fridge Food Supply Chain To Bring Cheer To Farmers – Inc42, accessed October 25, 2025, https://inc42.com/startups/ninjacart-fixing-india-flawed-fresh-produce-food-supply-chain-bring-cheer-to-farmers/
94. Ninjacart Revolutionizes Agri-Tech and Empowers Agri Citizens – Startup Spectrum, accessed October 25, 2025, https://thestartupspectrum.com/ninjacart-revolutionizes-agri-tech-and-empowers-agri-citizens/
95. Twiga Foods works with micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) to transform the Kenyan food system – CGIAR, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.cgiar.org/news-events/news/twiga-foods-works-with-micro-small-and-medium-enterprises-msmes-to-transform-the-kenyan-food-system/
96. Twiga, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.twiga.com/
97. Kenyan Produce Company Connects 13000 Farmers to Vendors – Food Tank, accessed October 25, 2025, https://foodtank.com/news/2019/07/kenyan-produce-company-connects-13000-farmers-to-vendors/
98. Technology Connects Kenyan Smallholders with Market Access, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gafspfund.org/projects/technology-connects-kenyan-smallholders-market-access
99. Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) disrupt food systems to deliver healthy diets to urban consumers: Twiga case study, Nairobi, Kenya – CGSpace, accessed October 25, 2025, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/7b52f529-1b3f-4e6c-a5bc-31e16bc4aaae/content
100. Twiga Foods halts Nairobi operations, considers new distribution hub – TechCabal, accessed October 25, 2025, https://techcabal.com/2025/06/06/twiga-foods-halts-nairobi-operations/
101. Twiga Pauses Nairobi Operations to Shift to Data-Driven Distribution Model – Tech In Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.techinafrica.com/twiga-pauses-nairobi-operations-to-shift-to-data-driven-distribution-model/
102. OP-ED – Abderrahmane Chaoui unpacks the challenges of asset-light models in Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.africantechroundup.com/unpacking-the-challenges-of-asset-light-models-in-africa-feat-abderrahmane-chaoui/
103. Africa’s Emergent Tech Sector: Characteristics and Development, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/102463/ssoar-afrspe-2025-1-lay_et_al-Africas_Emergent_Tech_Sector_Characteristics.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
104. Twiga Foods cuts 300 roles, sets up newco – Techpoint Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://techpoint.africa/insight/techpoint-digest-1100/
105. What Twiga Foods’ Restructuring Teaches Us About Scaling Smart: Lessons for Startups and Operators – OfficePhase, accessed October 25, 2025, https://officephase.com/2025/05/26/what-twiga-foods-restructuring-teaches-us-about-scaling-smart-lessons-for-startups-and-operators/
106. Twiga’s pivot to asset-light model begins with acquisition of Kenyan distributors – Hadu, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.hadu.app/articles/mr5mRa56ixoD4tSrT
107. Apollo Agriculture, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.apolloagriculture.com/
108. AI-driven smallholder farmer lending in Africa: Insights from Apollo Agriculture – GSMA, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/blog/ai-driven-smallholder-farmer-lending-in-africa-insights-from-apollo-agriculture/
109. Apollo Agriculture Raises $40M for African Farmers – CZI News, accessed October 25, 2025, https://chanzuckerberg.com/newsroom/apollo-agriculture-raises-40-million-to-expand-platform-to-help-small-scale-farmers-improve-their-yields/
110. Apollo Agriculture, Inc. – Investment 01 – British International Investment, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.bii.co.uk/en/our-impact/investment/apollo-agriculture-inc-investment-01/
111. Apollo Agriculture: Revolutionizing Small-Scale Farm Funding, accessed October 25, 2025, https://visionfund.com/insights/apollo-agriculture-startup-small-scale-farming
112. Apollo Agriculture – British International Investment, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.bii.co.uk/en/story/apollo-agriculture/
113. YoLa Fresh Secures $7 Million Pre-Series A round, Set to Revolutionize Africa’s Fresh Food Supply Chain – Janngo, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.janngo.com/yola-fresh-a-grubmarket-for-morocco-digs-up-7m-to-connect-farmers-with-food-sellers/
114. Mathias Charles Yabe: Revolutionizing Ghana’s Agriculture Sector to Reduce Post-Harvest Losses – TTYBrand Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://ttybrandafrica.com/mathias-charles-yabe-revolutionizing-ghanas-agriculture-sector-to-reduce-post-harvest-losses/
115. AkoFresh – MIT Solve, accessed October 25, 2025, https://solve.mit.edu/challenges/resilient-ecosystems/solutions/47971
116. AkoFresh’s Cold Storage Containers Are Saving Ghana’s Fruit And Vegetables, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/videos/these-off-grid-cold-storage-containers-are-saving-ghana-s-fruit-and-vegetables-uplink/
117. Fruit and Vegetable Cold Storage | AkoFresh | Kumasi, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.akofresh.com/
118. Ghana: Farmers use solar powered cold storage to keep produce fresh, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2022/09/ghana-akofresh-solar-powered-cold-storage/
119. County Aggregation and Industrial Parks – Delivering the Plan, accessed October 25, 2025, https://governance.co.ke/county-aggregation-and-industrial-parks/
120. Kenyan agri counties set to benefit from state-backed industrial parks – FreshPlaza, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.freshplaza.com/africa/article/9541625/kenyan-agri-counties-set-to-benefit-from-state-backed-industrial-parks/
121. Fostering Agro-Industrial Growth in Kiambu County: A Bottom-Up Approach to Industrialization and Economic Transformation | African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, accessed October 25, 2025, https://journals.spu.ac.ke/index.php/amjr/article/view/393
122. Kenya – Launches the Meru County Aggregation and Industrial Park – Investment Policy Hub, accessed October 25, 2025, https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-policy-monitor/measures/4441/launches-the-meru-county-aggregation-and-industrial-park-
123. Farm to Market Alliance, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.farmafrica.org/programme/farm-to-market-alliance/
124. Farm to Market Alliance – Making Markets Work Better for Farmers, accessed October 25, 2025, https://ftma.org/
125. Farm to Market Alliance (FtMA) – WUR eDepot, accessed October 25, 2025, https://edepot.wur.nl/541806
126. Farm to Market Alliance | World Food Programme, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.wfp.org/farm-market-alliance
127. An Expanded Perspective of the Farm to Market Alliance – Mercy Corps AgriFin, accessed October 25, 2025, https://mercycorpsagrifin.org/insights-from-a-recent-case-study-on-ftma/
128. Impact at Scale: Farm to Market Alliance’s Journey to Growth as a Catalyst for Agricultural Innovation, accessed October 25, 2025, https://wfpinnovation.medium.com/impact-at-scale-farm-to-market-alliances-journey-to-growth-as-a-catalyst-for-agricultural-e12c4b9b8332
129. Navigating the Shift: From Asset-Light to Asset-Heavy Models in Global Logistics, accessed October 25, 2025, https://logixmindz.com/navigating-the-shift-from-asset-light-to-asset-heavy-models-in-global-logistics/
130. Ghana’s Complete Farmer is connecting African farmers to global markets – Techpoint Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://techpoint.africa/feature/complete-farmer-ghanaian-agritech/
131. When “Asset Light” Is Right – Boston Consulting Group, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.bcg.com/publications/2014/business-model-innovation-growth-asset-light-is-right
132. Asset-Light Logistics: The Future of Logistics – X2 (UK), accessed October 25, 2025, https://x2uk.com/asset-light-logistics-the-future-of-logistics/
133. Key Challenges & Barriers to Agricultural Technology Adoption – Folio3 AgTech, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agtech.folio3.com/blogs/agricultural-technology-adoption-barriers/
134. Main drivers and barriers to the adoption of Digital Agriculture technologies – ResearchGate, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379844456_Main_drivers_and_barriers_to_the_adoption_of_Digital_Agriculture_technologies
135. Full article: Factors affecting digital technology adoption by small-scale farmers in agriculture value chains (AVCs) in South Africa – Taylor & Francis Online, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02681102.2021.1975256
136. Digitalization of agriculture in Africa – E3S Web of Conferences, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/13/e3sconf_agritech-xi2024_03002.pdf
137. New GSMA Report Launches at Digital Africa Summit Ghana, Revealing Policy Reforms Supporting Digital Transformation Could Add $3.4 Billion to the Country’s Economy by 2030, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gsma.com/newsroom/press-release/new-gsma-report-launches-at-digital-africa-summit-ghana-revealing-digital-transformation-could-add-20-billion-to-the-country/
138. Overcoming the barriers to technology adoption on African farms – Brookings Institution, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/overcoming-the-barriers-to-technology-adoption-on-african-farms/
139. Top 6 challenges for Agri-techs to overcome in Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.agrifrontier.com/case-study/agtech-challenges/
140. The Future of African Agri-fin-techs: Strategic Support is Essential for Food Security – Imfuyo, accessed October 25, 2025, https://imfuyo.farm/news/the-future-of-african-agri-fin-techs-strategic-support-is-essential-for-food-security/
141. Fintech in Africa: The end of the beginning – McKinsey, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/financial-services/our-insights/fintech-in-africa-the-end-of-the-beginning
142. Working Paper 67 Digital Technology in Kenya – Plaas, accessed October 25, 2025, https://plaas.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Working-Paper-67-Digital-Technology-in-Kenyan-Agriculture-Kiaka.pdf
143. Why gender-inclusive agritech is becoming big business – The World Economic Forum, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/12/why-gender-inclusive-agritech-is-becoming-big-business/
144. How female agents foster inclusivity in digital agriculture | Mobile for Development – GSMA, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/blog/how-female-agents-foster-inclusivity-in-digital-agriculture/
145. State of the Evidence for Digital, Bundled Agricultural Services | CEGA, accessed October 25, 2025, https://cega.berkeley.edu/article/state-of-the-evidence-for-digital-bundled-agricultural-services/
146. Evidence for digital and bundled services: Framing a research agenda for the Digital Agricultural Innovations and Services Initiative | The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.povertyactionlab.org/blog/7-14-22/evidence-digital-and-bundled-services-framing-research-agenda-digital-agricultural
147. AgriTech – Smart Africa, accessed October 25, 2025, https://smartafrica.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/71613-continental-agritech-blueprint-eng.pdf
148. Assessing digital market access and mobile finance tools in boosting agribusiness growth among rural farming communities – | World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, accessed October 25, 2025, https://journalwjarr.com/sites/default/files/fulltext_pdf/WJARR-2025-2579.pdf
149. Harvesting Tomorrow: The Emerging Agricultural Technology Market In Kenya, accessed October 25, 2025, https://kilimo.co.ke/harvesting-tomorrow-the-emerging-agricultural-technology-market-in-kenya/
150. Beyond data: How to unlock agriculture’s full potential | World Economic Forum, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/05/beyond-data-how-to-unlock-agriculture-full-potential/
151. India’s agri future needs more than tech, and ITCMAARS shows the path to scale, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.hfsresearch.com/research/indias-agri-future-tech-itcmaars/
152. The future of agriculture: 10 technology trends – Agro.Club, accessed October 25, 2025, https://agro.club/tpost/zmhdxej441-the-future-of-agriculture-10-technology
153. Agritech Market Size & Share Analysis – Industry Research Report – Growth Trends, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/global-agritech-market
154. Agritech Report 2026 – StartUs Insights, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.startus-insights.com/innovators-guide/agritech-report/
155. Agriculture Technology Trends 2026: Farming Innovations Worth $148 Billion To Explore – GreyB, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.greyb.com/blog/agriculture-technology-trends/
156. The Mobile Economy Africa 2025 – GSMA, accessed October 25, 2025, https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-economy/africa/
157. Is Artificial Intelligence the future of farming? Exploring opportunities and challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa – World Bank Blogs, accessed October 25, 2025, https://blogs.worldbank.org/en/agfood/artificial-interlligence-in-the-future-of-sub-saharan-africa-far
158. THE DIGITALISATION OF AFRICAN AGRICULTURE REPORT – CGSpace, accessed October 25, 2025, https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/55210860-060d-49cd-a45f-ca7e3be88826/content